A series of investigative articles by veteran journalist Cece Woods is raising fundamental questions about the integrity of the prosecution that led to Rebecca Grossman's murder conviction for the 2020 traffic collision that killed two children. Published through the independent platform The Current Report, the fifteen-article series examines how the Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office and Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department handled evidence, investigation, and narrative development in a case that garnered national attention.
The reporting identifies multiple areas requiring scrutiny, including missing and suppressed evidence, concerns about procedural fairness, allegations of selective prosecution, and questions about how media and political factors influenced a case tried as murder rather than as a tragic traffic accident. These issues carry significant implications for public confidence in how justice is administered, particularly in high-profile cases where intense media coverage can influence legal proceedings.
Among the specific questions raised is why prosecutors delayed filing charges against Grossman until December 29, 2020, three months after the accident and weeks after District Attorney George Gascón took office, raising concerns about political timing. The series also examines why potentially exculpatory testimony regarding former major-league baseball pitcher Scott Erickson, who was driving a vehicle ahead of Grossman that night, was allegedly bypassed or excluded from consideration.
Physical evidence handling has emerged as another critical concern. Investigators reportedly never conducted DNA testing on the front bumper of Grossman's car, which might have provided important information about whether both children were struck by her vehicle or by Erickson's. Additionally, critical pieces of evidence including a fog light cover and license plate frame that did not match Grossman's Mercedes were documented as missing from the crash-site evidence chain, despite potentially pointing to another vehicle's involvement.
The series further questions why prosecutors allegedly changed legal theories between proceedings, denying racing allegations in Erickson's misdemeanor hearing while invoking a racing narrative in Grossman's trial without full disclosure of those changes to the jury. Internal records, depositions, and coroner's documents obtained by The Current Report reportedly reveal concealed misconduct, raising accountability questions for both the Sheriff's Office and District Attorney's Office.
These revelations matter because they challenge fundamental principles of due process and equal justice under law. When evidence handling, witness testimony management, or prosecutorial decision-making in high-profile cases appears inconsistent or questionable, it undermines public trust in the entire justice system. The implications extend beyond this specific case to how future prosecutions are conducted and perceived.
The Current Report has called for independent review of the Grossman investigation and prosecution by oversight bodies, public release of relevant internal records and investigative files, and open hearings to examine why key evidence was missing and why certain witness testimony was omitted or changed. Such transparency measures could help address concerns about whether due-process safeguards were adequately maintained throughout the proceedings.
For more information about the investigative series, visit https://thecurrentreport.com. The questions raised by this journalism have substantial implications not only for Grossman's case but for how justice is perceived and administered in cases that capture public attention, making this examination crucial for maintaining confidence in legal institutions.
