Sales Nexus CRM

U.S. Silicon Metal Producers Challenge Unfair Foreign Imports with Trade Petitions

By FisherVista

TL;DR

Ferroglobe and Mississippi Silicon LLC seek investigations into unfairly traded silicon metal imports, ensuring fair competition and protecting American industry's viability.

Detailed petitions filed with Commerce and ITC allege dumping and subsidies, outlining steps to investigate and potential imposition of special duties on imports.

Enforcing trade laws against unfairly traded imports from multiple countries protects U.S. industry, workers, and promotes fair competition, safeguarding domestic production.

Silicon metal, critical for national security-related products, faces unfair trade practices, invoking trade laws to maintain industry viability and ensure fair competition in the market.

Found this article helpful?

Share it with your network and spread the knowledge!

U.S. Silicon Metal Producers Challenge Unfair Foreign Imports with Trade Petitions

U.S. silicon metal producers Ferroglobe USA, Inc. and Mississippi Silicon LLC have initiated legal action against international manufacturers from Angola, Australia, Laos, Norway, and Thailand, alleging systemic unfair trade practices that threaten domestic industrial capabilities.

The companies filed antidumping and countervailing duty petitions with the U.S. Department of Commerce and U.S. International Trade Commission, presenting evidence of pricing strategies that potentially undermine American manufacturing. The petitions highlight dumping margins as high as 337.84% and numerous alleged subsidies that distort market competition.

Silicon metal, a critical raw material containing at least 85% elemental silicon, plays a crucial role in multiple high-technology and national security-related industries. The material is essential for producing aluminum, silicones, polysilicon, and components used in semiconductor, solar, and electronics applications.

Marco Levi, CEO of Ferroglobe PLC, emphasized the significant impact of these imports, stating that dumped and subsidized products have dramatically reduced volumes and prices for domestic producers. Eddie Boardwine, CEO of Mississippi Silicon, argued that while American manufacturers can compete globally, the current import practices create an uneven playing field that threatens domestic industrial capacity.

The legal action covers all silicon metal forms and sizes meeting specific compositional requirements. Anticipated next steps include Commerce initiating investigations by May 14, 2025, with a preliminary International Trade Commission determination expected by June 9, 2025.

The petitions represent a critical effort to protect domestic manufacturing, highlighting broader concerns about international trade practices and their potential impact on U.S. industrial competitiveness. By challenging these imports, the silicon metal producers aim to restore fair market conditions and safeguard the strategic importance of domestic production in technologically advanced sectors.

Curated from News Direct

blockchain registration record for this content
FisherVista

FisherVista

@fishervista